Evolutionary Theory: The Relationship Between Science and Religion :: Evolution

Evolutionary Theory The Relationship Between cognition and ReligionIn The Selfish Gene (1), Dawkins introduced the concept of replicating units of information, called memes. They compete for our minds and our hearts, replicating in society in the form of fairy tales, catchy tunes, moral codes and theories. nonpareil of the most prolific struggles today occurs between the titanic memes of Science and Religion. mend their relationship is complex, its historical trajectory is one of co-evolution, mapping the gradual appeal of adaptive responses to each other. As these stories change, so too do our networks of meaning. sick bedfellowsIn considering the Christian faith (not more important than any other, notwithstanding one that I am familiar with), the role of religious belief is typically perceived as one of moral guidance. Before intelligence arrived on the scene in the West, however, religion also served an explanatory function, as through with(predicate) the Bibles story of creation. This role did not fade into the background when a entrant science was first established. As a matter of fact, scientific endeavors were appropriated by natural theologians funded by the Church (for example, through the 19th century Bridgewater Treatises (2)) to tell the existence of God through the manifestations of intelligent design in nature. Gradually, science began to develop its own philosophy and methodologies. It even began to provide new answers to the how questions that religion had previously addressed. Then came evolution. In 1859, the publication of Darwins Origin of Species (3) held a magnifying rubbish to the fissure that had been growing. The two giants found themselves playing with different sets of rules. Revelation and faith, positive methodologies in religion, were simply unacceptable to science. Lovers spatAlthough religion relegated control of translation and began to focus on spirituality and values, the conflict is far from resolved. Dawkins ( 4), like more other proponents of science, simply believes that religion is obsolete. Learning and knowledge, he argues, will swooning the cobwebs in our minds that gave rise to religion in the first place. Others give way proposed science as a new agnostic religion (5) and moral frame (6), praising its commitment to evidence and philosophy of deduction. Those in agreement have raised their own Big Questions (7) from within the ranks of the natural and social sciences, as well as the humanities. Discussions in the World Question Centre (8), for example, stray from democracy and complexity to sustainability and fear.