Political Anthropology Power, Ideology & Inequality Essay

governmental Anthropology Power, Ideology & Inequality - Essay ExampleIt was feudal kingdoms of Europe, which associated the word civilization with their culture, way of life, religious beliefs and political system. opposite cultures were addressed as uncivilized The comparison was a series of forced understanding and a justification to do and implant civilization in the rest of the planet, which had been declared either lacking some properties or having them in excess. (Jameson and Miyoshi, 1998, p. 33). This was the first attempt of expanding own way of life on others, later on labeled globalisation.globalization is the right of the strongest - this core feature has remained in almost primeval form. Western civilization unites the most developed countries of the contemporary ball into a hegemony inducing its culture to the rest of the planet. There is no constant leader of this expansion At any one time a single state can be number 1 among the Great Powers... This was the case with Britain in the mid-nineteenth century and with the United States from 1945 to the 1970s (Agnew, 1998, p. 7). Through this form of hegemony understandings and practices regulating orb politics originated from Europe become dominant.Advocates of globalisation often speak of new choices brought into regions. Global gives a new perspective to local, indeed producing new ways of life More persons in more parts of the world consider a wider set of possible lives than they ever did before. recently, whatever the force of neighborly change, a case could be made that social life was largely inertial (Appadurai, 1991, p. 197). Influencing on local traditions with a global view is meant to give bigger picture of the world we live in. Sadly, this good intention has a worthless implementation in fantastic propagation of better or more civilized culture destroying local way of life too often.Meanwhile in that respect is a clear variance between theoretical debates on globalisation (how should it be) and its practical side (how is it in reality). By encouraging students to display their virtuosity in abstraction, the discipline brackets questions of theft of land, violence, and slavery - the three processes that have historically underlain the unsymmetrical global order we now find ourselves in (Krishna, 2001, p. 401). Indeed, the means of globalisation repeatedly look horrible in comparison to its ends. Globalisation habitually serves as an excuse for further expansion and the theory silently turns away from how locals are given these new possibilities of life. While modern culture obliges globalisation to avoid the unnecessary violence, there are more effective ways of influencing local cultures.Countries of western civilization have enough economical power at their disposal to make brute force avoidable. The countries that form the Group of Seven, with their 800 million inhabitants, control more technological, economic, informatics, and military power than the rest of the approximately 430 billion who live in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe, and Latin America. (Hetata, 1998, p. 274). capitalistic culture uses its power for indirect methods of control, such as informational dominance.Information is the key to control - this simple righteousness has already become moss-grown. Culture is based on the knowledge people accumulate through their lives and canalise to